Single-component versus multicomponent dietary goals for the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial
- PMID: 25686165
- PMCID: PMC4456033
- DOI: 10.7326/M14-0611
Single-component versus multicomponent dietary goals for the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Few studies have compared diets to determine whether a program focused on 1 dietary change results in collateral effects on other untargeted healthy diet components.
Objective: To evaluate a diet focused on increased fiber consumption versus the multicomponent American Heart Association (AHA) dietary guidelines.
Design: Randomized, controlled trial from June 2009 to January 2014. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00911885).
Setting: Worcester, Massachusetts.
Participants: 240 adults with the metabolic syndrome.
Intervention: Participants engaged in individual and group sessions.
Measurements: Primary outcome was weight change at 12 months.
Results: At 12 months, mean change in weight was -2.1 kg (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.3 kg) in the high-fiber diet group versus -2.7 kg (CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the AHA diet group. The mean between-group difference was 0.6 kg (CI, -0.5 to 1.7 kg). During the trial, 12 (9.9%) and 15 (12.6%) participants dropped out of the high-fiber and AHA diet groups, respectively (P = 0.55). Eight participants developed diabetes (hemoglobin A1c level ≥6.5%) during the trial: 7 in the high-fiber diet group and 1 in the AHA diet group (P = 0.066).
Limitations: Generalizability is unknown. Maintenance of weight loss after cessation of group sessions at 12 months was not assessed. Definitive conclusions cannot be made about dietary equivalence because the study was powered for superiority.
Conclusion: The more complex AHA diet may result in up to 1.7 kg more weight loss; however, a simplified approach to weight reduction emphasizing only increased fiber intake may be a reasonable alternative for persons with difficulty adhering to more complicated diet regimens.
Primary funding source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Figures
Comment in
-
JPEN Journal Club 19. The Data vs the Message.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 May;40(4):596-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607115621736. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016. PMID: 27208156 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Weight loss with diets focused on 1 versus several dietary changes.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):I-30. doi: 10.7326/P15-9004. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25686183 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of AHA dietary counselling on added sugar intake among participants with metabolic syndrome.Eur J Nutr. 2018 Apr;57(3):1073-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1390-6. Epub 2017 Mar 28. Eur J Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28353070 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conventional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2004 May 18;140(10):778-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-10-200405180-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15148064 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of high protein and high fiber weight-loss diets in women with risk factors for the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial.Nutr J. 2011 Apr 28;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-40. Nutr J. 2011. PMID: 21524314 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthful Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Known Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2017. PMID: 29364620 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A new look at dietary fibers in metabolic syndrome.Ter Arkh. 2018 Apr 19;90(4):85-90. doi: 10.26442/terarkh201890485-90. Ter Arkh. 2018. PMID: 30701880 Review.
Cited by 17 articles
-
The effect of high dietary fiber intake on gestational weight gain, fat accrual, and postpartum weight retention: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 24;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03016-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32448177 Free PMC article.
-
The Nutritious Eating with Soul (NEW Soul) Study: Study design and methods of a two-year randomized trial comparing culturally adapted soul food vegan vs. omnivorous diets among African American adults at risk for heart disease.Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Jan;88:105897. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105897. Epub 2019 Nov 16. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 31743793
-
Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies.J Biom Biostat. 2018;9(5):415. Epub 2018 Nov 26. J Biom Biostat. 2018. PMID: 31360594 Free PMC article.
-
Boosting healthy food choices by meal colour variety: results from two experiments and a just-in-time Ecological Momentary Intervention.BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7306-z. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31331299 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Self-Monitoring Strategies for Weight Loss in a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 28;7(2):e12209. doi: 10.2196/12209. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30816851 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
-
Full Text Sources
-
Medical