Resolving the conflict: clarifying 'vulnerability' in health care ethics
- PMID: 24783324
- DOI: 10.1353/ken.2014.0005
Resolving the conflict: clarifying 'vulnerability' in health care ethics
Abstract
Vulnerability has been extensively discussed in medical research, but less so in health care. Thus, who the vulnerable in this domain are still remains an open question. One difficulty in their identification is due to the general criticism that vulnerability is not a property of only some, but rather of everyone. By presenting a philosophical analysis of the conditions of vulnerability ascription, we show that these seemingly irreconcilable understandings of vulnerability are not contradictory. Rather, they are interdependent: they refer to the same concept with different likelihoods of manifestation. We argue that the general vulnerability of living beings relies on their having certain types of interests. In health care, those individuals are particularly vulnerable who are more likely to have these interests unjustly considered. They should be afforded special protection in order to receive what is due to everyone, but which they are likely to fail to receive.
Similar articles
-
Vulnerability: what kind of principle is it?Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(3):281-7. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-6857-6. Med Health Care Philos. 2004. PMID: 15679020
-
Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account.Bioethics. 2019 Jan;33(1):19-34. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12471. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Bioethics. 2019. PMID: 30136737
-
A pragmatic analysis of vulnerability in clinical research.Bioethics. 2017 Sep;31(7):515-525. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12367. Bioethics. 2017. PMID: 28786177 Free PMC article.
-
The ground of dialogical bioethics.Health Care Anal. 2002;10(4):391-402. doi: 10.1023/A:1023431310918. Health Care Anal. 2002. PMID: 12814286 Review.
-
A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Sep;17(9):5-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 28829266 Review.
Cited by 6 articles
-
Teaching Vulnerability in Research: A Study of Approaches Utilized by a Sample of Research Ethics Training Programs.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):395-407. doi: 10.1177/1556264619869130. Epub 2019 Aug 17. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31423879
-
Methodological Bias That Can Reduce (or Affect) the Process of Diagnostic Construction in Clinical Settings.Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:157. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00157. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30804844 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Relational autonomy in the care of the vulnerable: health care professionals' reasoning in Moral Case Deliberation (MCD).Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Dec;21(4):467-477. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9818-6. Med Health Care Philos. 2018. PMID: 29243015 Free PMC article.
-
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28249596 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding and Addressing Vulnerability Following the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: Applying a Feminist Lens to Examine Perspectives of Haitian and Expatriate Health Care Providers and Decision-Makers.J Hum Rights Pract. 2016 Jul;8(2):219-238. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huw007. Epub 2016 May 9. J Hum Rights Pract. 2016. PMID: 27617037 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
-
Full Text Sources
-
Other Literature Sources