Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status
- PMID: 20598282
- PMCID: PMC3012124
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009
Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status
Abstract
Objective: Recommendations by health care providers have been found to vary by patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status and may contribute to health disparities. This study investigated the effect of these factors on recommendations for contraception.
Study design: One of 18 videos depicting patients of varying sociodemographic characteristics was shown to each of 524 health care providers. Providers indicated whether they would recommend levonorgestrel intrauterine contraception to the patient shown in the video.
Results: Low socioeconomic status whites were less likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than high socioeconomic status whites (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.69); whereas, socioeconomic status had no significant effect among Latinas and blacks. By race/ethnicity, low socioeconomic status Latinas and blacks were more likely to have intrauterine contraception recommended than low socioeconomic status whites (OR, 3.4; and 95% CI, 1.1-10.2 and OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6, respectively), with no effect of race/ethnicity for high socioeconomic status patients.
Conclusion: Providers may have biases about intrauterine contraception or make assumptions about its use based on patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Discussion: 'Recommendations for intrauterine contraception' by Dehlendorf et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.042. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20875499
-
Interdisciplinary perspectives on race, ethnicity, and class in recommendations for intrauterine contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):293-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.051. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20875500 No abstract available.
-
How does provider bias impact pregnancy and abortion disparities?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):e20; author reply e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21396621 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Discussion: 'Recommendations for intrauterine contraception' by Dehlendorf et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.042. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20875499
-
Interdisciplinary perspectives on race, ethnicity, and class in recommendations for intrauterine contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):293-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.051. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20875500 No abstract available.
-
Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 26093190
-
Mirena (Levonorgestrel intrauterine system): a successful novel drug delivery option in contraception.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009 Aug 10;61(10):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.022. Epub 2009 May 13. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009. PMID: 19445984 Review.
-
Increasing LARC utilization: any woman, any place, any time.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):718-30. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000071. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25314089 Review.
Cited by 38 articles
-
Implicit Bias in Counseling for Permanent Contraception: Historical Context and Recommendations for Counseling.Health Equity. 2020 Jul 17;4(1):326-329. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0025. eCollection 2020. Health Equity. 2020. PMID: 32775942 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement between Self-Reported "Ideal" and Currently Used Contraceptive Methods among Women Veterans Using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.Womens Health Issues. 2020 Jul-Aug;30(4):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Apr 19. Womens Health Issues. 2020. PMID: 32321666
-
Insights Into Provider Bias in Family Planning from a Novel Shared Decision Making Based Counseling Initiative in Rural, Indigenous Guatemala.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):10-17. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00377. Print 2020 Mar 30. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020. PMID: 32234840 Free PMC article.
-
Automated Tool for Health Utility Assessments: The Gambler II.MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Mar 18;5(1):2381468320914307. doi: 10.1177/2381468320914307. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2020. PMID: 32215320 Free PMC article.
-
The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision.Open Access J Contracept. 2019 Dec 19;10:103-110. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S231196. eCollection 2019. Open Access J Contracept. 2019. PMID: 31908549 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
-
Full Text Sources
-
Other Literature Sources