Physicians' attitudes toward preventive therapy for coronary artery disease: is there a gender bias?
- PMID: 16144216
- PMCID: PMC6654010
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960280809
Physicians' attitudes toward preventive therapy for coronary artery disease: is there a gender bias?
Abstract
Background: While much of the gender difference in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) results from the fact that the women being treated are older and have more comorbidities, it remains to be established whether a true gender bias exists. We compared physicians' attitudes and practice toward preventive therapy in men and women with CAD.
Hypothesis: Physicians perceive the prevention of CAD in men as more important than in women.
Methods: In the "attitude study," we obtained data on the attitudes of 172 physicians toward treatment, using hypothetical case histories of 58-year-old male and postmenopausal female patients with identical clinical and laboratory data and mild coronary atherosclerosis on angiography. In the "actual practice study," we evaluated the lipoprotein levels and prescription of lipid-lowering medications from medical records of 344 male and female patients with angiographic evidence of CAD.
Results: In the hypothetical case histories, physicians in general considered the male patient to be at higher risk and prescribed aspirin (91 vs. 77%, p < 0.01) and lipid-lowering medications (67 vs. 54%, p < 0.07) more often for the male patient. Evaluation of medical charts of patients with CAD revealed that in patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol > 110 mg/dl, 77% of the males received a lipid-lowering medication, compared with only 47% of the female patients (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: We found evidence for a gender bias in the attitude as well as in actual practice of secondary prevention toward patients with CAD. While the proportion of male patients receiving lipid-lowering medications appears appropriate, the proportion of women receiving such treatment remains undesirable.
Similar articles
-
Preventive therapy in patients with insignificantly narrowed coronary arteries: evaluation of physician attitude and practice.Clin Cardiol. 2004 Jun;27(6):328-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960270605. Clin Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15237690 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of coronary angiography on use of lipid-lowering agents in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. For the WISE Investigators.Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 1;85(9):1083-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00700-1. Am J Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10781756
-
Effects of practice setting on quality of lipid-lowering management in patients with coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jun 15;81(12):1416-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00209-4. Am J Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9645890
-
Assessing coronary artery disease in women: how useful is coronary angiography?Medscape Womens Health. 1998 May;3(3):1. Medscape Womens Health. 1998. PMID: 9732089 Review.
-
Identifying patients at risk for coronary heart disease: implications from trials of lipid-lowering drug therapy.QJM. 2000 Sep;93(9):567-74. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/93.9.567. QJM. 2000. PMID: 10984551 Review.
Cited by 14 articles
-
Implicit Gender Bias and the Use of Cardiovascular Tests Among Cardiologists.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 29;6(12):e006872. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006872. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 29187391 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28249596 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Gender on Satisfaction and Confidence in Cholesterol Control Among Veterans at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):806-814. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5739. Epub 2017 Feb 13. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017. PMID: 28192012 Free PMC article.
-
Statin Adherence: Does Gender Matter?Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):63. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0619-9. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016. PMID: 27696318 Review.
-
Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives.Circ Res. 2016 Apr 15;118(8):1273-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307547. Circ Res. 2016. PMID: 27081110 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
-
Full Text Sources
-
Other Literature Sources
-
Miscellaneous